Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 4701 - 4720 of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm by John Elwood
Department of Education relisted a petition raising this issue twice before denying review over a dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am by Alex Wohl
 Alexander Wohl is an Adjunct Professor and a consultant to the Law and Government Program at the Washington College of Law. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Lovechilde
Donald Payne (D-NJ 10th), Nancy Pelosi (D-CA 8th), David Price (D-NC 4th), Nick Rahall (D-WV 3rd), Charles Rangel (D-NY 15th), Silvestre Reyes (D-TX 16th), Lynn Nancy Rivers (D-MI 13th), Ciro Rodriguez (D-TX 23rd), Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA 33rd), Bobby Rush (D-IL 1st), Martin Olav Sabo (D-MN 5th), Loretta Sanchez (D-CA 46th), Bernie Sanders (I-VT At Large), Thomas C. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a post by Article 19 Director Thomas Hughes, “Who will protect press freedom now? [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 12:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Imagine if on Earth #2, Justice Kennedy did not change his mind in Casey, and overruled Roe. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:08 am
And here is the argument from Justice Scalia’s dissent, joined by Justices Thomas and Kennedy, that such speech would indeed likely be excluded by the law (some paragraph breaks added): The Court takes the peculiar view that, so long as the clinics have not specifically authorized their employees to speak in favor of abortion (or, presumably, to impede antiabortion speech), there is no viewpoint discrimination. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:58 am
(As Dahlia Lithwick pointed out, Kennedy seemed to have a particular concern with the need for people to protect themselves from Grizzely Bears.) [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
IPSO 09326-21 Kennedy v Real People, 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), No breach – after investigation 11214-21 Zaman v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were two defamation (libel and slander) claims filed on the media and communications list last week. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy and Clarence Thomas have joined his opinion, with some concurrences, as we’ll soon find out. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The second episode of Media Law Podcast has a debate between Dr Thomas Bennett and Dr Paul Wragg under the title “Invasion of Privacy – What’s the harm? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/LiDjmP (Tam Hebert) CNIL Offers Guidance on Aligning Cloud Services with Data Protection Requirements – http://bit.ly/R1YUyi (Myria Saarinen) Floodgates Open as Social Media Arrives in Finance World – http://bit.ly/Llh0rV (Amy Henzmann) German Data Protection Authorities Issue Resolution and Guidance Paper on Smart Metering – http://bit.ly/N4nQkc (Hunton Williams) Health Care Jobs in Balance with Court Ruling – http://bit.ly/LF1QCk (Beecher Tuttle) Heart… [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
Lyle Denniston, the dean of Supreme Court reporters (and someone whose writing I've long admired), posted a long and thoughtful reply to my previous post. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:33 am by Alan Horowitz
Justice Kennedy’s dissent, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, reached a different conclusion on the basic tax dispute. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:39 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Take a look at what happened to Helen Thomas when she dared to express a private opinion about Israel and the Palestinians. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 11:14 pm
Introduction  "It takes a theory to beat a theory"--this is surely one of the top ten all-time comments uttered by law professors to one another in those ritual interactions that are called "faculty workshops" or "colloquia. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:44 pm by Adam White
” (The seat, he explained elsewhere, went to future Justice Anthony Kennedy.) [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 14 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Ibrahim v Kennedy. [read post]