Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 45,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In Whren v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 3:22 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:45 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization was the culmination of a decades-long campaign to reverse the holding of Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
Supreme Court's orders list this morning does include certiorari grants as well as denials, and the Court did take up United States v. [read post]
12 May 2007, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Tony Booker (1980)American antislavery law long denied the problem of sexual assault in slavery. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:14 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm
Given how long it has taken to put relief mechanisms in place, the amount approved “may be insufficient to address longer-term damage from the pandemic”. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:58 pm
Why not allow the states to make such policy judgments, so long as they do not oppress a discrete and insular minority? [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am
Copyright holders have long ignored these potential infringements for a range of economic and public relations reasons. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm
Feb. 3, 2010)(citing Barnes v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
Recent Supreme Court decisions such as Hudson v Michigan (2006) and Herring v United States (2009) have sparked a new debate over the efficacy of exclusionary remedy, and once again drawn its continued viability as a constitutional mandate into question. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 2:24 pm
Absent personal service within the state, New York state courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-domiciliary only as permitted by New York's long-arm statute. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 8:22 am
Moen, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Sandifer v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:10 pm
Light v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:25 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:03 am
Carey Manor Ltd. and Newsome v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
