Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 4701 - 4720 of 20,242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 9:53 am by Justin P. Webb
As the article states, the regular use of penetration testing tools does not fall within the ambit of the law, as long as the purpose is legal, and everything is above board. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
In these conjoined appeals the appellants challenged decisions upholding the secretary of state’s refusal to grant them indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom. [read post]
The Long Beach nursing home’s citations resulted from a total of three surveys by state inspectors. [read post]
The Long Beach nursing home’s citations resulted from a total of three surveys by state inspectors. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 3:59 pm
Respondents also counter the standards proposed by petitioner and the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:28 am by Ray Dowd
  The National Stolen Property Act has long forbid the transport, possession and concealment of stolen property (as does the law of every state), but prosecutors don't have the gumption to take on rich, powerful and popular museums. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
We can also consider more contemporary lower court decisions adjudicating challenges to laws discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.One important theme running through this precedent employs a recurring set of criteria (tracing back to the famous Footnote 4 of the United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 10:30 am by Famighetti & Weinick
Today’s Long Island employment law blog explores the decision in Menaker v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
[A long history of amending resolutions with legal effect.] [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
  As we have long said, it is past time for the oft and long criticized opinion in  Shop in the Grove, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm
This would require riding roughshod over Article IV, §1 of the United States Constitution, section 1913, subdivision (a) of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and time honored principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel. [read post]