Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 19,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2020, 5:02 am
[B]oth parties agree the Third Restatement [of Torts] definition [of "product"] is the appropriate one. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am
We aren’t agreeing. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
The full court sits only in cases of great public importance while “acting judges” drawn from the regional courts of appeal for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland may be called upon to participate in specific matters affecting their regions. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
First, citing LLC Law § 701 (b), Justice Platkin determined that: the mere withdrawal of Smith and Dominelli did not operate to dissolve FSL or deprive it of the status of an operating entity. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 4:57 pm
A PRIMER on International Arbitration for Board MEMBERS & Local COunsel Arbitration is not a new concept, in fact it has been used for centuries, with Plato writing about arbitration amongst the ancient Greeks. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:43 am
One often doesn’t see IRS challenges to GRAT valuations, since an adjustment in value doesn’t result in an immediate gift because of the adjustment provisions built into GRATs. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
While prompt resolution of your legal matter is our goal, our approach is fundamentally different. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 6:13 am
That doesn’t sound much like a “chief law enforcement officer” to us. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
The district court granted the committee’s motion for summary judgment, holding that it had subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:49 pm
T. has so far been resolved only “on an interim basis,” Brief for Respondent 56, n. 13, and that custody proceedings, including the matter of M. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
Well, you ain’t above mine. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
I have shown one of the claimant's registered trade marks and one of the defendant's signs, but you can see them all in the judgment if you click on the link, should you feel it necessary.There was not a high enough level of similarity to find a likelihood of confusion under Article 9(2)(b), but that didn't matter much because the Deputy Judge held that there was unfair advantage, so Red Bull succeeded. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 2:03 am
Companies and their representatives are encouraged to contact SEC staff with questions or matters of particular concern. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:26 pm
Whether a student should testify has to be evaluated matter to matter, depending on the unique facts and evidence in the case. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am
(Belinda appears to be referring to R.C. 2317.02(B)). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm
§5685(b), 18 U. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
Fly, 348 N.C. 556 (1998) and the plain language of the current statute, the court held: [T]he requirement that the exposure be “in the presence of” the victim does not require a jury to find that the victim could have seen the exposed private parts had he or she looked. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am
In patent/© money matters a lot; is it b/c there’s a consumer interest where the consumer doesn’t benefit if $ changes hands? [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
” Which answers matter? [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
If we think that consumers don’t react, then TM will create a mismatch b/t law & consumers’ use of TMs as we try to refine it. [read post]
