Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(Spicy IP) Defining ‘literary works’ for copyright protection (International Law Office) Drafting and interpretation of patent claims (IP Frontline) Israel Israel Patent Office accepts lacks jurisdiction and rules anyway: Karl Storz GmbH & Co v Bausch and Lomb (The IP Factor) Economist report ranks Israel 10th in terms of innovation (The IP Factor) Mauritius Mauritius launches IP sensitivity drive (Afro-IP) Netherlands Presiding… [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm
Since the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
United States Postal Service, [985 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir. 1993)]; Kreppein v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 11:37 am
Four bites at the apple are three too many.United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
If the examination standards in the United States were not changing, we might expect successful applications in the United States by US inventors to grow at about the same rate as our measure of internationally important inventions originating in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm
”) Normally does not mean always.[1] See Normally, Cambridge Dictionary (2019), https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dict ionary/english/normally (defining “normally” as “usually or regularly” and “usually, or in most cases” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
– SKARB KIBICA trade mark dispute(Class 46) Similarity of signs, homogenity of goods – ALT ATLANTIC word-figurative mark case (Class 46) The average consumers’ confusion – ALFOFARM TM dispute(Class 46) South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal confirms territoriality of IP rights in Gallo Africa v Sting Music (Afro-IP) Seeing Red: colour marks case Henkel AG v Trefoil Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd (Afro-IP) Spain… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 am
Menzel v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co. v J & S United Amusement Corp., 67 NY2d 1044, 1046 [1986]; accord Allstate Ins. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
These provisions of Texas' self-defense laws generally track the laws in other U.S. states. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
(PatLit) United States US Patent Reform US Patent Reform: America Invents Act passes Senate with broad support and status update (Maryland IP Law Blog) (IPblog) (Patent Law Practice Center) Post-disclosure grace period – unique but good policy (Patently-O) What are the provisions of the proposed ‘First-inventor-to-file’ System in S. 23? [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
United States and two related cert petitions the justices will consider at Monday’s “long conference,” the first after their summer recess, that “present what is unquestionably the most important civil-military relations question that [the court has] confronted in decades. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:31 am
Id. at 138-39 (quotation marks, citations, footnotes, and edits omitted; emphasis added); see also Ellsberg v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:14 am
Many thanks, by the way, to Mark Sableman for having represented me in Spear v. [read post]
