Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 4701 - 4720 of 16,984
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by Howard Friedman
The grant of certiorari was specifically on:Whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:35 am by Amy Howe
Today the justices granted the funeral home’s petition for review, agreeing to consider whether Title VII bars discrimination against transgender people based on either their status as transgender or sex stereotyping under the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
We talked about some of the many battles this interaction has birthed, from massive resistance against Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court granted the Unkechaug=s application and, inter alia, transferred jurisdiction over the proceeding to the Unkechaug. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
Sheehan, but dismissed it as improvidently granted. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:55 am by Hui Zhang
Interim Judgment On March 27, 2019, the SPC IP Tribunal issued its first decision in a patent case Valeo v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This matter has arisen in the context of an appeal by the appellants against a decision granting summary judgment to the respondent. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Margaret Taylor
Under section 6(e) of the FRCP, certain people involved in a grand jury proceeding “must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury,” including the grand jurors themselves, the government attorney presenting the case to the grand jury, the court reporter and other technical people involved in the proceeding itself. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]