Search for: "People v. Render" Results 4701 - 4720 of 5,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The statutory duty does not extend to every kind of activity that people engage in on the premises. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Anyway, it’s probably a non-starter of a suggestion, since there are very few if any people in Canada who are sufficiently expert lawyers or economists to fulfill this role and who would not already have too much baggage to carry and still be perceived as credible to all concerned.So, I expect that my fear – shared by others – that this gratuitous statutory  references to the “public interest” and a “competitive market” will become an excuse… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
  One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am by familoo
Last week saw promulgation of Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52, a summary of which you can find here. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
was originally posted on Copyhype FootnotesGrant v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 5:52 am
In his November 19, 2009 ruling in R. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by D. James Greiner
Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:56 am by INFORRM
The ‘rule in Bonnard v Perryman‘ provides that injunctions are denied in libel if the defendant promises credibly to defend the case at trial. [read post]