Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 4701 - 4720 of 6,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
It is often the primary, if not sole manner, of communications between the Plaintiffs and their students. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:19 pm by Juan Antunez
The “last resort” requirement can be traced directly to Bacardi v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:08 am by Jack Pringle
Attributing an error a secure calendar system involves people and process, not reliance solely on a software product. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:14 pm by velvel
As the Madoff and Stanford cases have taught yet again, we cannot rely solely on governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to detect fraud early-on. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:00 am by Enchanta Jackson
Black women are not the sole doomed race of women that endure the extremities of life. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:20 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
 Use It or Lose It Calculating the notice and recapture dates are the author or composer's sole responsibility. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
They aren't doing so to confuse people, but because it is a design aesthetic. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:05 am
 "Judge invokes Monet, Picasso in Red Sole trade mark analysis" is Christopher Pett's take on the recent Louboutin v YSL saga, hosted on Art & Artifice here (this case comes up for discussion by Mar-Ellen Field and Annsley the AmeriKat in this year's Handbags at Dawn Fashion and IP conference on 22 September). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
During the marriage Alan was the sole working spouse and exercised "complete control" of the couple's finances - sound familiar? [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
During the marriage Alan was the sole working spouse and exercised "complete control" of the couple's finances - sound familiar? [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
Comedy Partners (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court S D New York: Louboutin blue over red sole decision favouring YSL – preliminary injunction denied: Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]