Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 178,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 6:15 am
The appeals court found that the plaintiff’s future medical care award should not have been reduced as a result of free services provided by the VA. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:58 am
There was a plaintiff’s verdict yesterday in federal court in Natchez in favor of Ill. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:27 am
Georgetown law professor Richard Lazarus has been named executive director of the Obama administration’s new commission on the Gulf oil spill. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:05 am
An Indiana federal district judge dismissed plaintiff's complaint for lack of jurisdiction, saying:The immigration judge presiding over the Plaintiff’s removal proceeding has de novo review of the USCIS’s denial of the Plaintiff’s I-485 Application.... [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:42 am
In this case, Krannitz had offered to settle, notwithstanding the lack of merit to the plaintiff”s claim. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:37 pm
The plaintiff's contentions are without merit. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:37 am
Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment against defendants for failing to provide discovery was granted. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
However plaintiffs were informed by an attorney in the Secretary of State's office that an exemption would be granted only if an applicant submitted a state form signed by a religious leader who attested that use of a social security number was barred by the beliefs of his or her religious sect and that the applicant was a member of that sect. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
A plaintiff cannot avoid forum selection clauses by selecting its claims and forums separately. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:22 pm
As the mother’s quest for accountability unfolds, a crucial question emerges: Can a plaintiff prevail in a medical malpractice case without the indispensable backing of expert testimony? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:27 pm
The trial court agreed with plaintiffs, holding that the city’s actions constituted inverse condemnation. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
.), the court granted in part and denied in part a Motion to Dismiss.The case arose out of a claim that the Plaintiff allegedly suffered injuries from using a mole cream on his scalp.The late Judge Pratter noted that, in reading the Plaintiff's Complaint, the Plaintiff purchased the mole removal cream from Amazon.com or, if not Amazon, then Wal-Mart, or Target, or eBay. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 4:33 am
When defense counsel argued that there was "very little useful information in those emails," plaintiff's counsel renewed plaintiffs' objection as to other emails on the grounds of relevance and the burden and cost of searching them for privileged information. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 10:27 am
Plaintiff countered arguing that Defendant’s allegations of infringement against Plaintiff’s customers implicitly accused Plaintiff of indirect infringement and, therefore, created a case or controversy sufficient to give the Court jurisdiction over the declaratory judgment counts. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Plaintiff in this action sought a declaration that the Defendants' failure to consider and appoint female candidate on the eligible list established from a civil service examination for the position of juvenile counselor with the New York City Administration for Children's Services (ACS) violated the State and City Human Rights Laws (Executive Law §296[1][a]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 8-107[1][a]). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Plaintiff in this action sought a declaration that the Defendants' failure to consider and appoint female candidate on the eligible list established from a civil service examination for the position of juvenile counselor with the New York City Administration for Children's Services (ACS) violated the State and City Human Rights Laws (Executive Law §296[1][a]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 8-107[1][a]). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 7:36 am
The trial court denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on liability pursuant to labor Law § 240(1), finding questions of fact as to whether plaintiff was permitted to be on site at the time of the accident and whether anyone had instructed plaintiff to access the roof of the building. [read post]
5 Apr 2006, 8:20 pm
" The Court, concluding that the plaintiff's claim arises under the Copyright Act, denied its motion to remand. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:18 am
Defendants, however, contend that plaintiff's proposed class action does not meet the first, second, and fourth prongs. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:34 pm
(S. [read post]
