Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 4701 - 4720 of 11,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 12:53 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Canada’s IPO disagrees w/her that AI is not capable of authorship/joint authorship, and inexplicably registered AI as coauthor of painting created by combining photo and van Gogh as base datasets. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 11:31 pm by Chris Manes
However, the INC system is one area where the FTB takes the initiative in collecting residency-related information to investigate an individuals residency status. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:59 am by SHG
In February, President George W. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm by Carrie Cordero, Paul Rosenzweig
The report’s authors appear to make a distinction between study subjects who are “U.S. citizens by birth” (147 individuals) and those who were “foreign-born, naturalized, and received U.S. citizenship” (148 individuals). [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As the Seventh Circuit's opinion indicates, the Justice Department's substantive legal position is rather weak. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:01 pm by Guest Blogger
But let’s recognize them for what they are.Trevor W. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 4:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Incremental creativity of the type one might expect even in a competitive industry w/o ©? [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Churchill (1994) ("potential disruptiveness" sufficient to outweigh First Amendment value in a nurse's statement critical of her supervisor and hospital's obstetrics department because it could discourage individuals from working in that department and undermine management's authority). [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 8:01 pm
It's no longer left vs. right, it's state worship vs. individual rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If perfume is protected, anyone who’s copied w/in the statute of limitations is on the hook; but Congress typically adds subject matter on a forward-looking basis, and can deal better w/timing and retroactivity. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:15 am by Joel R. Brandes
English law provides: [w]here a child's father and mother were not married to each other at the time of his birth- (a) the mother shall have parental responsibility for the child; (b) the father shall not have parental responsibility for the child, unless he acquires it in accordance with the provisions of this Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 6:39 pm by Jon Gelman
Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.)Richard W. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:31 am by Eugene Volokh
” Part of the court’s rationale was that “Pennsylvania law clearly provides that a court may prevent the disclosure of an individuals participation in the program in order to prevent substantial physical harm. [read post]