Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 6,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Above all, these acts are crimes against the People of the State of New York and Society must be considered as well as the 'family tranquility.' Finally, this Court must take note of the recent decision in the case of People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:02 pm
These listening sessions were then followed by a session with a “Washington insiders” proxy group where a unique Instant Response Dial technology was used to measure responses to a range of messages. 2011. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
Collective redundancies (USA v Nolan). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:47 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013 (DC Cir. 1923). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 pm
In June 2010, while carrying out a tandem skydiving session with a young woman, Zarda stated he was gay in defense of a female client’s allegation that he touched her inappropriately. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
Among these decisions was Wolf v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
She stated it was two intertwining female symbols. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:35 pm
Police Seize Property and Threaten Unsubstantiated Charges In a March 2017 ruling in Leonard v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
Sessions III (sitting by designation), the Second Circuit vacated the class certification order and remanded for further proceedings. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:27 am
“ On November 30, 2021, in State of Louisiana v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The conference also provided a platform for academic deliberation on the recent Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
This training session was held in Jacksonville at the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office on July 19, 2016. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:34 pm
More recently, in the 2008 military commission case of U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:56 pm
It was the activist (as well as 100% Republican) Texas Supreme Court decision, State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 2:58 pm
Agency for International Development v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:55 am
Yet, courts consistently allow such testimony, as evidenced in the recent Third Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:55 am
Yet, courts consistently allow such testimony, as evidenced in the recent Third Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]