Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 11,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 7:54 am
In the state of Illinois, driving under the influence (DUI) is a serious offense. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
On Afro-IP, Caroline NCube's series on African states' IP policy takes her alphabetically from Cameroon to Comoros. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:02 am
§ 101 as directed to patent-ineligible subject matter, the PTAB analyzed the claim utilizing the Mayo framework set forth in Alice v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
Attorney Jay V. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Supreme Court: McCutcheon v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
Baltimore Sports & Social Club, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:45 am
The Second Circuit says she does not.The case is Isett v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 5:56 am
A first responder’s PTSD still must meet the criteria set forth in the DSM-V and be diagnosed by a doctor of psychology or a medical doctor working in a related field. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
Cooper v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
That's what happened to this guy, but the Court of Appeals reinstates the conviction.The case is Watson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
Under Riegel v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:12 am
Andrusiek v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:25 am
Sincerely, Robert V. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
The group filed an amicus brief in Boumediene v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Travelers v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:30 pm
Simms v London Borough of Islington [2008] EWCA Civ 1083 is Court of Appeal case from a s.204 appeal. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
However, the district court struck down Ariosa’s process claims as unpatentable under Myriad Genetics’s Products of Nature holding, stating that “paternally inherited cffDNA is a natural phenomenon and the claims of the ’540 patent merely add well-understood, routine, conventional activity in the field to that natural phenomenon. [read post]
