Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 13,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 6:09 am
United States and applies to certain federal lands, including tribal reservations. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, and Cyan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:23 pm
As the Court held in Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:21 am
Tech., Inc., 523 U.S. 751, 756 (1998) (stating that “tribal immunity is a matter of federal law and is not subject to diminution by the States”); Cook v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:47 pm
A federal judge in Colorado has shut down a uranium leasing program in that state, finding that the Department of Energy violated the National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act (Colorado Environmental Coalition v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 10:51 am
Using Lytle v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:30 am
In Western Watersheds Project v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
You’ve Been Served Angellino v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
You’ve Been Served Angellino v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:13 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear argument in American Legion v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
Faleomavaega Panel 7 — Policing Violence against Indian Women — Sarah Deer, Christi Belcourt, Sam Hirsch Panel 8 — Tribes, States, and Taxes — Gabriel Galanda, Shana Barehand, Mary Streitz Break-out Panel 1 — United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
United States, when it held: "When a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.'" In United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:27 am
Dept. of the Interior (Land into Trust)Navajo Nation v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 12:11 pm
Apocalypse Now: The Unrelenting Assault on Morton v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 9:47 am
At the time, Trump emphasized that whatever decision states make should be the law of the land within their territory. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 4:08 pm
To the oral argument of the Citizens Against Casino Gambling v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
The City asserted that the amendment was categorically exempt from CEQA (CEQA Guidelines §15305 [Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations]), as the action was consistent with prior city interpretation and administration of the General Plan which resulted in projects as less than the minimum stated in the various land use districts. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 3:15 am
See Reed, 576 U.S. at 163; AAPC, 591 U.S. at 618 (plurality opinion); United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 11:38 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
