Search for: "State v. Liberator" Results 4701 - 4720 of 7,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
In this case of the federal system, this assumption means that liberal Democrats want liberal judges, conservative Republicans want conservative judges, and so forth. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 9:31 am
They oppose what they regard as liberal judicial activism (e.g., Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Part 3 takes a more in-depth look at the legal side of abortion in Canada, including the liberalization and decriminalization of abortion, as well as a comparison of how abortion is treated in Canada versus the United States, and shifts in the anti-abortion movement. [read post]
4 May 2016, 2:37 pm by David Schraub
To be sure, intermediate scrutiny -- even in its muscular United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm by Jim Martin
  Sixteen years later, in his dissent in Bush v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
If you split conservatives and liberals, that’s marginally or not significant for conservatives and significant for liberals. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:31 pm
Supreme Court some years to establish its authority over state courts with respect to federal law, a feat accomplished in 1816 in Martin v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by Alicia Ely Yamin
This incident is instructive for what we will increasingly see in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The Guiding Principles envisage a vast panoply of judicial and non-judicial initiatives, of State-based and non-State based measures. [read post]