Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 4,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2007, 5:13 pm
This panel wasn't really about the advertised topic (which is a little bit amusing, given the consumer protection focus) because, I think, practicing lawyers are not as concerned about statements by real consumers as about related issues, particularly promotional statements that don't disclose the marketer's involvement.Mary Engle, Associate Director of Advertising Practices, FTC: For the most part, the FTC isn't concerned… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
That might be a legitimate interest (pace Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:28 am
A217A Pheffer (MS) -- Establishes the identity theft prevention and mitigation unit
No Same as
BLURB : Exec. identy theft prev mitgn unt
Last Act: 04/09/07 amend and recommit to consumer affairs and protection
04/09/07 print number 217a
A7280 Finch (MS) -- Authorizes uniformed marine patrol officers in Cayuga county to carry firearms
Same as S 3119
BLURB : CP L. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:24 am
The following terms are important in the mortgage and housing profession, but often come up in division of property in a divorce situation: SOURCE: DivorceNet203(b): FHA program which provides mortgage insurance to protect lenders from default; used to finance the purchase of new or existing one- to four-family housing; characterized by low down payment, flexible qualifying guidelines, limited fees, and a limit on maximum loan amount. 203(k): this FHA mortgage… [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 10:55 am
Shepherd Smith and Edwards is a law firm committed to protecting such clients and making sure that they don't incur financial losses as a result of brokers not correctly fulfilling their fiduciary duties to them. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Cir. 2002), citing Tualatin Electric v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
We'd tear up ideas about novelty, originality, independent creation. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:52 pm
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 12:22 pm
You may be no better off if the defect occurs and your Ford doesn't burn up, either. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
They don't need the protection of the per se rule in order to enforce [their power]. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:02 am
The consumer clips are typically rounded up through a contest, with a promise to broadcast or post the winners. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 7:11 am
Right: what cats would do if they only had opposable thumbs - clever visuals by imgag.com (click on image for full effect)* On the evidence and employing normal principles of patent claim construction, Smurfit couldn't show that LB's engagement mechanism and plug contained the features described in Claim 1 of the patent.The IPKat wishes that the tamper-evident seal was there to protect the consumer against deterioration of the quality of the wine, rather than… [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 11:48 am
That's protected too. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:00 pm
Suffice it to say, I’m looking forward to part two.Finally, I learned today that Washington’s Consumer Protection Act won’t be amended in this legislative session. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 4:42 pm
Typically, consumer protection advocates favor strict liability for online advertisers. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:46 am
District Court case, Andrews v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
The ruling in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 am
Here's the unusual case where consumer ignorance prevents infringement, because consumers don't recognize the existence of a mark. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 1:14 pm
Custom Vehicles, Inc. v. [read post]
