Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 4701 - 4720 of 11,371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2016, 4:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Army Corps of Engineers (Dakota Access Pipeline; Injunctions)Stand Up for California! [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Hence, in late August, California Governor Jerry Brown vetoed a state law that would have required prospective lawyers to complete at least 50 hours of supervised pro bono work before admission to the bar. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:30 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
District Court, Southern District of California (September 6, 2016)Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 3:05 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Army Corps of Engineers (Dakota Access Pipeline; Injunctions)Stand Up for California! [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of due process barred courts from exerting general personal jurisdiction over the defendant. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
More Blog Posts: California Court of Appeal Affirms Judgment in Favor of Insured When Uninsured/Underinsured Liability Coverage Limit Had Been Met, Southern California Injury Lawyer Blog , October 14, 2015 California Court of Appeals Finds for SCRAMP in Fatal Motorcycle Accident Case, Southern California Injury Lawyer Blog, June 23, 2015 [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 12:02 pm by Kamran Mirrafati
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (covering Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington) recently dealt a major blow to employers when it struck down an arbitration agreement that forced employees to pursue work-related claims individually. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Contrast with this the California right of publicity, which the Ninth Circuit federal appeals court held bars the use of a robot that wore hair and jewelry reminiscent of Vanna White and was posed in front of a “Wheel of Fortune”-like game board.) [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 10:54 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The trial court dismissed the petition and complaint without leave to amend, concluding that the suit was time-barred under Public Resources Code section 21167, subdivision (d). [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:04 am by Eugene Volokh
California Government Code § 8195 provides that “The State of California may not sell or display the Battle Flag of the Confederacy, also referred to as the Stars and Bars, or any similar image, or tangible personal property, inscribed with such an image unless the image appears in a book, digital medium, or state museum that serves an educational or historical purpose. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
The Hively court began its discussion by stating that it could have limited its ruling to a few sentences, affirming the district court and finding that the plaintiff had failed to state a claim under Title VII by citing its own prior holdings that this provision does not cover sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:37 pm by Liz Klebaner
 The Commission’s action increased protections for the species by allowing for state and citizen enforcement actions through the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the state courts. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This was a curious ruling at the time—three years after the California Supreme Court had said the opposite in the famous Marvin v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:23 am by Georgialee Lang
Luther Jones, now 70 years old, ill and frail, was released from prison and is expected to receive compensation of about $1 million dollars from the State of California. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
(California is now considering adoption of a non-uniform version of the ABA Rules.)The ABA lobbies state supreme courts to adopt the ABA Model Rules, and almost every state court has done so. [read post]
  Accordingly, California employers with arbitration agreements containing class action waivers may wish to remain in state court, rather than attempt to remove to federal court. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:49 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities: California – Little-Regulated Accounts Offer a Path to Political Clout in SacramentoMarin Independent Journal – Jessica Calefati and Kaitlyn Landgraf (Bay Area News Group) | Published: 8/20/2016 Ballot measure committees, the accounts that are supposed to promote or oppose state and local initiatives, are in practice paying for California lawmakers’ consultants and polling firms, new suits, and trips to… [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
Those states are Vermont, California, Connecticut, and Massachusetts and Oregon. [read post]