Search for: "US v. Shields" Results 4701 - 4720 of 4,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In this article, opportunities to use empirical methods to study possible bias in investment arbitration are surveyed. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:12 am by The Regulatory Review Staff
May 9, 2022 | Aborting the Right to Abortion | A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion turns the national debate over Roe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am by Marty Lederman
 In such cases, an employer purchases an employee insurance policy from an insurance company, or issuer, such as Aetna or Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and the issuer itself then bears the costs of reimbursing employees for their health care expenses. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
One is that the Court is against what is often called "patent exceptionalism" - i.e., against the Federal Circuit's use of patent-specific rules that differ from similar doctrines used other fields. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:25 pm by Josh Blackman
The purpose of the penalty, as the government explained to the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
” No court, he argued, had ever upheld Congress’ use of its subpoena power to obtain the personal papers of a sitting president. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
In this review, we use several sources for the cohort: (1) the civil business-fraud case brought against Trump, his family members, and his businesses by the New York Attorney General; (2) the 2020 “Kraken” King v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
On July 17, 1998, one hundred and sixty nations adopted the Rome Statute, a treaty that established the International Criminal Court (“ICC”).[35] The ICC is a permanent court that does not replace national criminal justice systems but rather is an investigative court that only prosecutes when a nation is unable to or refuses to.[36] The ICC has jurisdiction over genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.[37] The act of “intentionally directing… [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 2:13 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
In Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Amazon the Court of Justice of the European Union has imposed duties on businesses and professionals to inform their consumer customers about at least the existence and the basic structure of the more favourable law principle. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am by Dáire McCormack-George
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This was no more apparent than the Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am by Maria Kendrick
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]