Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 10,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2009, 5:45 am
V. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 1:47 pm
Starr v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:20 am
The timing of the suit also raises several questions because the UGG mark has been used for footwear in the United States since at least 1998 and UGG was named “brand of the year” by Footwear News in 2003, nearly a decade ago. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:39 am
Move Press had registered this trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and its use of the mark clearly preceded the use by Peloton. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
Of the ninety-four district courts across the United States, we have the sixth-heaviest criminal caseload per judge. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:24 pm
As a far as I know, the constitutionality of the ban on registering trademarks containing “the flag or coat of arms of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation,” 15 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:22 pm
See also … United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:01 am
At present, the US Supreme Court is considering whether the case merits its further review, and has now invited the Solicitor General, Donald Verrilli, to "file a brief in the case expressing the view of the United States" (see here for an explanation of the Solicitor General's role). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:55 am
Supreme Court, in Powell v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
(quotation marks omitted). [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
The reasons for this phenomenon are addressed below.First, examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark Office are given very little time to issue Actions on what are often very complex and detailed patent applications. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rev. 755–802 (1993); Larry Catá Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, 6 S. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm
In short, one may describe the Bill as ushering in Britain’s equivalent of the CFIUS framework in the United States of America. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:58 pm
On April 6, 2023, the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives (the "Committee") issued a subpoena, directing Mark F. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:26 pm
” Mary Kay, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:22 am
. , Serial No. 77954696 [Section 2(a) refusal of SWISS+TECH for expandable and compact multi-function hand tools and electronic devices, on the ground of geographical deceptiveness].May 8, 2012 - 10 AM: United States Postal Service v. [read post]
