Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 4701 - 4720 of 10,391
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
”   In other news… United States The PRC-U.S. war of words spilled well beyond Secretary Kerry’s Asia trip. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Cyrus Farivar
The 7th Circuit will now consider a 2013 case known as United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:07 am
Cir. 2009).Applicant argued that "aux Etats Unis" would be translated as "to the United States," but the Board found that the phrase could also mean "in the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
This leaves the situation with metatags unclear in the UK, but remains as insight into the application of IP rights in metatags for the time being.In the United States the question has not been answered definitely, with different Circuit Courts taking different approaches. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:23 am by Lisa Baird
This date marks the announced deadline for a new data-sharing agreement between the European Union and the United States, as well as the coinciding deadline set by EU data protection authorities for companies previously Safe Harbor-certified to have other data transfer mechanisms in place. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:23 am by Lisa Baird
This date marks the announced deadline for a new data-sharing agreement between the European Union and the United States, as well as the coinciding deadline set by EU data protection authorities for companies previously Safe Harbor-certified to have other data transfer mechanisms in place. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:02 am by corynne mcsherry
Two years ago, Fox News sued a company called TVEyes, which creates a text-searchable database of broadcast content from thousands of television and radio stations in the United States and worldwide. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In relevant part, § 1442(a)(1) provides that `[a] civil action . . . that is commenced in a State court’ may be removed to federal court if the action is against `any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States . . . for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]