Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 4721 - 4740 of 9,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 7:32 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  His thesis: social change through litigation is not effectuated through litigation decisions and process memorialized in a case decision but rather by the interaction between courts and government agencies. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:50 am by Robert L Abell
Dealing with a Dodgy Landlord Tenant Foreclosure Rights & Claims Against A Landlord In Arizona Under-occupying tenant's 'emotional attachment' to home no defence against eviction, court rules Commercial Landlord Must Wait Until End of Lease to Recover from Defaulting Tenant Says Supreme Judicial Court [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:37 am by Ray Ybarra-Maldonado
  While the Supreme Court issued today a blow to the Voting Rights Act, it is important to remember that advocates in the 1960's were busy organizing marches from Selma to Montgomery and intentionally pushing their agenda forward despite the violence they were facing. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm by Cicely Wilson
After extensive Arizona state and federal court proceedings, the Supreme Court denied petitions for certiorari and for rehearing. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
And click here for the Supreme Court page displaying the Local Rules of Practice for all the Superior Courts. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am by Mark Graber
            Today’s opinions from the Supreme Court highlight how the conservative majority is reverting to judicial practices before the New Deal, but not in the way many commentators expected. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Congress made an exception, however, for criminal prosecution, reflecting the Obama Administration’s public intention to try the 9/11 terrorists in federal court.7 Second, the federal government suffered what many considered to be a defeat in its prosecution of Ahmed Ghailani, an al-Qaeda terrorist and the first Guantánamo detainee to be tried in federal court. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
While we’re waiting for the Supreme Court to issue its preemption ruling in the Bartlett case (possibly as early as 10:00 a.m. today), we thought we’d examine the Court’s recent preemption decisions in non-drug/medical device cases, Hillman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:14 pm by Jon Sands
(D) But the Arizona Court of Appeals concluded that jeopardy continued as to the felony-murder count because the jury hung on that count (even though it reached a verdict on the armed-robbery count). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 1:00 pm by azatty
McGregor, Retired Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court; Hon. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:19 am by immigrationprof
The Wake Forest Journal of Law and Policy is pleased to announce the publication of Volume 3, Issue 2, centering on the issues surrounding the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision, Arizona v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Joy Waltemath
An employee’s disability bias claim alleging that her employer discriminated against her based on her short stature survived her employer’s motion to dismiss, a federal district court in Arizona ruled (McElmurry v Arizona Department of Agriculture, June 11, 2013, Snow, G). [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On Monday, a mostly united Supreme Court rejected Arizona’s efforts to require voters to provide documentary evidence of their U.S. citizenship in order to register to vote in federal elections. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:06 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
It will likely have resonance in the wake of Monday’s Supreme Court decision striking down an Arizona law requiring people to prove their citizenship when registering to vote. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm
Arizona is probably after that, after losing in the Supreme Court yesterday, it won in the Ninth Circuit today.But its celebration should be tempered. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:28 am
Buried in that news cycle however were two important Supreme Court cases addressing the Constitution. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:08 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Blog of Legal Times] * The Supreme Court just invalidated Arizona’s proof-of-citizenship voter registration law, so of course Ted Cruz wants to add an amendment to the Senate immigration reform bill to require citizenship to vote because, well… duh. [read post]