Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 4721 - 4740 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am by Florian Mueller
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am by UKSC Blog
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am by Simon Lester
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
”  This corporate lobbying drive first focused on state legislatures. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:45 am by Vikram Raghavan
Mrinal is Associate Professor at National Law University, Delhi and Shwetasree is an IP attorney and founder of the law firm, Fidus Law Chambers. [read post]
” A rehearing of the case, before a “Grand Chamber,” affirmed the earlier decision. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
Anonymous Assistant: The Attractiveness Scale Or Venal & Grabbit: Refer-A-Friend Now.. back to the serious stuff from Clerkingwell.co.uk : The Legal Services Act – what now for Chambers ? [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
"  But again who is making this determination—which is incredibly subjective if some non-legally trained clerk office staff (or even judicial chambers) is making a determination that "the remedy sough has implication beyond the parties before the court. [read post]