Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 4721 - 4740 of 112,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2018, 7:21 am by Docket Navigator
Although [defendant] does not require sales people to live in their assigned territory, [it] admits that it 'tries to hire people living within their assigned sales territory,' one of which is New York. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:10 am by Docket Navigator
Finding that [defendant's] established and regular business in the District weeks before suit was filed is sufficient for establishing venue pursuant to Section 1400(b) does not offend Section 1400(b)'s purpose 'to eliminate the "abuses engendered" by previous venue provisions allowing such suits to be brought in any district in which the defendant could be served.'" ParkerVision, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:06 am by Docket Navigator
[Defendant] does not discuss in any detail why the invoices and summary chart should not be revealed to the public, nor why any danger cannot be mitigated by redacting confidential information or privileged communications. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 7:31 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendant's motion for a new trial because defendant was not prejudiced by the court questioning defendant's damages witnesses at trial. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 7:07 am by Docket Navigator
"Plaintiff asserts it will be irreparably harmed if the Court does not enjoin Defendant from seeking reexamination or inter partes review . . . [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  The court rejected her Title VII claim saying in part:Plaintiff does not allege that she informed Defendant that she had a religious objection to the COVID-19 vaccination, or even that Defendant was aware that she has a religious objection to the vaccine; she pleads only that she told her employer she did not want the vaccine and asked for "a reasonable accommodation as defined by law. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff could not establish that the Defendant did not have a reasonable basis for denying benefits under the policy or that the Defendant knew or recklessly disregarded its allegedly lack of a reasonable basis in denying the claim.According to the Defendant, the record before the court established that the parties merely disagreed over the value of the UIM claim and that such agreement does not constitute bad faith.The… [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The jury's mixed verdict, which convicted the defendant of possessing stolen property but acquitted her of third-degree grand larceny related to the same property, does not warrant a different result. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:52 am by Hanlon Law, PA
As representatives of the State, prosecutors have special responsibilities that the defense does not have. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:48 am
Currently, Wisconsin does not have “red flag” laws that allow for “extreme risk” protection orders that revoke a person’s right to own a firearm. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:54 pm by Howard Friedman
  ...Defendants thus seemingly use Bostock in an attempt to circumvent Congress and make major changes to the text, structure, and purpose of Title IX. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
  However, the jury realized that PVD does not cause pressure ulcers, neglect does. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:04 pm
The daughter does want to spend her money on legal fees to defend against her brother’s claim given that he is only seeking half of the estate. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:53 pm
The Court further held it does not matter whether a prosecutor is also present before the magistrate. [read post]