Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 17,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 8:15 am
PGS then challenged the asserted patents in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding that resulted in all of the claims being cancelled as obvious or anticipated. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
What does it look for income? [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
All of which is to say that if an instructor thinks enough of a professional writer’s work to assign it to a class, then such work should be as much a part of the university’s cost structure as any other part of this $35 billion Canadian enterprise. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:41 am
But it was impossible to find a book that addresses the role of the judiciary in IP like this one does. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 7:52 pm
., (here) the Central District of California found that IPR estoppel applies where the same IPR reference is later raised under the “known or used” prong of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:00 am
A mediator does not make decisions, but rather helps the both of you come to an agreement on everything. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
However, the BoA considers the reimbursement of the appeal fee in view of the unreasonable delay not equitable because the applicant did not make clear by any action that he did not tacitly agree with the stagnation of the proceedings (see reasons 35 and 36).Thus the BoA refuses the request of the appellant for the reimbursement of the appeal fee.To date the proceedings are still pending and the applicant is requested to pay renewal fees for the 18th year to the EPO! [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:45 am
Has the applicant exhausted domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention? [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
[p.35] 4. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
[p.35] 4. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
§ 103 based on IPR Estoppel under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:15 am
The post Federal Circuit Relies on Printed Matter Doctrine in Affirming Examiner’s Rejection of Claims Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 6:37 am
§ 251 does not include the terms “explicit” or “unequivocal. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:32 pm
Does that mean we should look toward broader subject matter or narrow subject matter—both of which could be more certain and stable? [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:00 pm
However, the new law increase the cash flow of certain kinds of businesses due to lower C Corp tax rates (reduced from adjustable rates up to 35% to a flat rate of 21%). [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:45 am
This calculation does not include any earnings made from the QOF investment. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
But at first blush, it does not appear to be a radical departure from substantive USPTO examination practice despite raising a few additional procedural hurdles that examiners are to overcome before rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm
The world of directors’ and officers’ liability is always dynamic, but 2018 was a particularly eventful year in the D&O liability arena. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 11:05 am
After contentious litigation, Oracle prevailed; a jury awarded more than $35 million in damages. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
"Writes Paul Krugman in "The Economics of Soaking the Rich/What does Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez know about tax policy? [read post]
