Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 44,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2009, 8:23 am
In light of Chief Judge Easterbrook's concurrence, I also write to stress the importance of the presumption of prejudice afforded to a defendant who has been denied the opportunity to allocute, and to reiterate why the standard adopted in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 3:14 am
§1155 as the source of the agency’s revocation authority; that provision states that the Secretary “may, at any time,” revoke approval of a visa petition “for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:51 am
Thanks to the IPKat for pointing out Knorr-Bremse Systems for Commercial Vehicles Ltd v Haldex Brake Products GmbH [2008] EWHC 156 (Pat), a ruling of England and Wales Patents Court where judge Mr Justice Lewison stated that "There is at the least a good arguable case that, even if KBS UK are bound by the non-challenge [to patent validity] clause (which in my judgment they are not) that clause is void because it contravenes article 81 EC:". . . 48. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:57 pm
Every state is required to issue marriage licenses to interracial couples according to Loving v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
In summing up the case, the Appeals Court offered two observations: (1) "NCPs are meant to be a temporary bridge to compliance for manufacturers that have 'made every effort to comply.' United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under this Treaty, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 9:46 am
Let’s take a deeper dive into The North Carolina State Bar v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:53 pm
In Students & Parents for Privacy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
In Amawi v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
We’re the good guys now! [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:06 pm
End of story.As I said, both sides have darn good points. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
But it didn't do the individual much good, as the high court affirmed the lower courts' judgment in the bank's favor. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am
asserted that the non-abortion-related substantive due process cases remain good law. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Faulkner v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:16 am
First, as to the bad news: Boxed in by the United States Supreme Court’s decisions on the enforceability of arbitration agreements, including in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:16 am
First, as to the bad news: Boxed in by the United States Supreme Court’s decisions on the enforceability of arbitration agreements, including in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
Harper:Members of this Court last discussed the outer bounds of state court review in the present context in Bush v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:04 am
CGL - LATE NOTICE - 5-MONTH DELAY UNREASONABLE AS A MATTER OF LAW - NO GOOD FAITH BELIEF IN NON-LIABILITYKaesong Corp. d/b/a Feel Health Beauty Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
