Search for: "Grant v Grant" Results 4721 - 4740 of 104,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2018, 1:33 pm by ilpc
The Northern District of Texas’s decision finding ICWA unconstitutional is stayed (put on hold and does not apply) pending the appeal of the decision to the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm by snahmod
Introduction In recent Terms the Supreme Court has shown considerable interest in individual immunity doctrine involving qualified immunity–about which I blogged on January 25, 2011 and may 31, 2011–and absolute immunity–about which I blogged on August 21, 2009. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
I know the Ninth Circuit was trying to be nice; indeed, generous. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
The Leon exception has always been somewhat perplexing to me. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:54 am by Kate Fort
Complaint: 2014 05 16 Complaint FINAL 2 Ex parte application for TRO:  2014 05 15 PASKENTA Ex Parte App for TRO and PI FINAL Rosette Affidavit: 2014 05 16 Affidavit of RAR in support of Ex Parte TRO FINAL Freeman Declaration: 2014 05 16 Freeman Dec FINAL w Exs Memorandum in Support of Ex parte application 2014 05 16 Paskenta MPA FINAL TRO: 4001_001 (1) [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 2:50 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
On appeal from: [2011] CSIH 25 The parties had cohabited in the respondent’s house after the respondent had strongly encouraged the appellant to sell her property and move in with him. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 1:36 pm
It takes real guts -- or stupidity -- to be a huge scammer and yet to file an appeal claiming that the FTC isn't allowed to make sure you don't scam additional people in the future. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:32 pm by snahmod
The First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Question Suppose a police officer arrests a person with objective probable cause to arrest but with the subjective motivation to arrest him because of something he said, in violation of the First Amendment? [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 11:59 am
I bet you get paid a ton of money for convincing the Court of Appeal to reinstate a $120 million jury verdict against Chevron notwithstanding the trial court's grant of a new trial.But you probably also get paid a ton of money for convincing the California Supreme Court to grant review and decide whether the Court of Appeal was correct.Probably even more if you eventually win in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Last Friday, March 21, 2008, the Supreme Court gave itself an extension of time, through April 28, 2008, to grant or deny review in Bell v. [read post]