Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 6,660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Island v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:48 pm
In that section, Congress stated unequivocally that “the United States government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States,” § 40103(a)(1). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm
In 2001, the United States Supreme Court in Egelhoff v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:01 am
United States, 100 F.3d 1525 (Fed. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:53 pm
EPA; Victory for Due Process and a Check on the Clean Water Act By R Tamara de Silva March 21, 2012 Today the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Sackett v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:35 am
Update 1: Two quotes worth noting: "Scalia joked in summarizing the decision from the bench that the Sacketts were surprised by the EPA decision that their land contained navigable waters of the United States 'having never seen a ship or other vessel cross their yard. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
The federal Clean Air Act requires the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“Administrator” or “EPA”) to promulgate modern pollution control limits at the massive Navajo Generating Station (“NGS”) and Four Corners Power Plant (“Four Corners”), located on Navajo tribal lands in Arizona and New Mexico, to remedy unhealthful, scenery-impairing air pollution in protected national parks and… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
See General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
Robinson Reviews U.S. Supreme Court Case Roberts v. Sea-Land Services and other Work Comp Happenings
19 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
Robinson details aspects of the Supreme Court of the United States Roberts v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm
Seek Lawful Nonimmigrant Status without leaving the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:22 pm
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects a person from being forced to provide evidence to the government for their own prosecution. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:42 am
Royal Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:00 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:40 pm
Unable to show “coercion” of their religious beliefs, the Indian plaintiffs could not rely on the First Amendment to protect their interests in aboriginal territory now owned by the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
