Search for: "Love v. State"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 9,059
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 8:27 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015)The general offices of the Central Party and State Council recently issued a directive calling for the strengthening of civic education in Chinese universities along the ideological lines specified through the Chinese Communist Party. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:25 pm
In Watts v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:00 pm
When the US Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:01 pm
In Shapiro v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court made a ruling in the recent case of Pagan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
But ONGC v SAW Pipes gives some indication on such types of cases, viz. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
But you should love disparate impact law. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Thus, as Jacob LJ explained in Actavis v Merck at [75], such a claim "is not aimed at and does not touch the doctor - it is directed at the manufacturer. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 3:44 am
E.g., Roadway Express, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
Today in Christeson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
In 1967 the Warren Court gave us the historic decision of Loving v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Holt v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:56 am
Those efforts got a huge boost from the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
In Duong v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
I love Plan59.com. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
For example, the Court’s 1967 Loving v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
And, of course, we have seen this argument before – when Virginia defended its law barring different-race marriages in Loving v. [read post]
