Search for: "MATTER OF JOHNSON"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 6,805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 404-405 (1989), and holding a St. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Johnson's blog, The Baseline Scenario religiously, ever single day, but never knew that it was him that I was reading.) [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
In Bartlett, the defendant “was unable to change [the product’s] composition as a matter of both federal law and basic chemistry. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Johnson, supra.State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
A software manufacturer, whose program allegedly truncated the monograph’s original 8-paragraph text to 5 paragraphs, was also sued, and the court allowed that claim to proceed – despite two layers of intermediaries closer to any purported failure to warn (pharmacist and publisher) both having no duty to the plaintiff as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am
” Christopher Johnson—space law adviser at the Secure World Foundation and adjunct professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center, where he teaches space law—pointed out during my interview with him that “the drafters have taken great care to take the applicable international law into consideration, and reflect this in the Accords, particularly with regard to the Outer Space Treaty, the Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Liability Convention, and the… [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:52 am
” The court added the observation “that a commercial bank is involved in a number of litigated matters does not give notice that insurance coverage is claimed under any specific one. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Because we could not show this for the fatal encounter involving my client Jordan Baker, and even though the officer admitted race was a factor he considered when stopping Baker, that did not matter under the law. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:30 am
—that war will be averted and the missiles withdrawn, it really doesn’t matter because Sherwin puts the reader so completely within the moment. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
At a much more retail level, the three bits from the 1866 discussions that I would put at the top of my “next documents in” list are (a) President Johnson’s full veto of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, especially its reverse-discrimination charge that the act itself represented improper discrimination in favor of the freedmen, (b) Lyman Trumbull’s response to that veto message, especially his response to Johnson’s reverse-discrimination charge… [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Johnson & Johnson, 672 F. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
A while back, a conservative law professor named Steve Calabresi penned a short paper, an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal and two more op-eds for The Hill, advancing a novel legal theory: that the Mueller investigation was unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In the 1880s, the attorney general issued an opinion stating that pardons Johnson gave to individuals before the 14th Amendment was ratified did cure their Section 3 ineligibility, but the implication was that subsequent pardons did not. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm
But the chief justice does not have to play this role, and he is not the final word on matters when he does. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Peri, 2 AD3d 425, 426; Johnson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:09 am
Mead Johnson & Co., LLC, 2015 WL 5615038 (S.D. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
For an example of this complex balancing test in action, consider the district court case Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2006, 7:52 pm
Walzer might say that this is because, as a factual matter, apparently lost causes turn out not to be lost after all - who would have thought, for example, that Churchill would come back to win and, for that matter, Europe was quite convinced that the North could never win the civil war and thought it a matter of moral obligation to intervene to end the killing.But in fact Walzer means something much stronger in moral rights terms - his argument is not factual in… [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
”Again, that is always true in presidential elections, but it is a matter of degree. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am
"** ** The court's holding here regarding the level of scrutiny to be applied in this case appears to be in conflict with two other decisions (Johnson v. [read post]
