Search for: "Morris's Case"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 5,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2008, 6:41 am
Snyder's Louisiana, we'd be # 2, but their score was wind-assisted, which is hardly fair):Investigators believe House went to see his ex-girlfriend Monday night who was at her current boyfriend Daniel Morris' house.Police say the girlfriend claims while House was talking to Morris he pulled out a gun and shot Morris in the face killing him then allegedly pointed the gun at the woman, but told her he couldn't kill her adding that that if he… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:31 pm
"I think that it went very, very well," attorney Morris Overstreet said. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
Punitive damages have a long history.[1] According to the conventional understanding, early Anglo-American courts awarded "exemplary" damages for a range of purposes, in some cases as compensation to a plaintiff for suffering "intangible wrongs" such as insults that caused dignitary harms and in other cases as punishment of "the defendant for his misconduct. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:01 pm
Earlier coverage or the Rodney Reed case is here. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:02 pm
In the court's previous punitive damages case, Philip Morris v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 9:37 am
But then again, it went generally unnoticed when a jury awarded an arbitrary $368 million in damages in that case, when the trial judge reduced that verdict to an arbitrary $150 million judgment, and when an intermediate appellate court reduced that figure to an arbitrary $82.6 million (which, with interest, works out to over $100 million).The US Supreme Court remanded to consider in light of Philip Morris v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:05 am
Philip Morris is asking the Supreme Court to review the portions of the opinion that rejected Philip Morris' preemption argument and rejected its request to expand the retrial beyond just the amount of punitive damages. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Once again, we've drawn in legal bloggers from around the country (and in today's case, the world) to present their take on the latest news impacting their respective industries. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
More after the jump.The earlier iteration of this case appears at Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
"Based on our analysis of Philip Morris and our review of our original decision and the proceedings in the trial court, we conclude Philip Morris does not compel a reversal or a further reduction of the punitive damages awarded in this case. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:53 am
Phillip Morris case. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
Defendant: Three Zee, Inc., Realty World, Michael Zeman Case Number: 2:2008cv01402 Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:50 am
Philip Morris upholding a punitive damage award that was nearly 100 times the amount of punitive damages (and largely ignoring the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:13 pm
(Note: (3) doesn't seem applicable to most false advertising cases, and as we'll see the court modified it here - which allowed the court to sidestep the issue of Brazilian trademark rights.) [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:23 pm
The trial court had allowed evidence of other bad acts, which the Court of Appeal ruled were too dissimilar.The appellate firm of Horvitz & Levy represented Unocal in the case, and is certainly entitled to plaudits. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:58 pm
Based on the US Supreme Court decisions in Philip Morris v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:20 pm
Their convictions impeded publication of the book until Morris Ernst's brilliant legal strategy gave his client, Random House, confidence that it could publish Ulysses in the United States without fear of prosecution. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 6:22 am
Philip Morris case. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 10:28 pm
A roundup of what's up with cases arising out of Gitmo:Gates v Bismullah In an attempt to limit the information it must provide the D.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 10:42 am
" However, the court concluded under the then-existing punitive damages due process cases, due process did not require any heightened review of a punitive damages award in arbitration. [read post]
