Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 5,283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We don't mind people saying we're full of it, we couldn't be litigators if we did, but that should be decided on the strength of our arguments, not on which side of the "v" we reside. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:10 am
In People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:27 pm
EDITOR'S NOTE: THOUGH PEOPLE SOMETIMES FORGET, THE LAW IS PRETTY CLEAR. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 12:05 pm
See, e.g., Livingston v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:02 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:58 am
New York State Court of Appeals: People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 5:25 am
In People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Stories of real lives of real people got lost in the shuffle of legalities. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
In my column, I discuss the implications of avoiding the federal constitutional question while simultaneously distinguishing the facts of People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 8:43 am
City of Detroit, No. 138091, concerning the sufficiency of the evidence in a Whistleblower claim, granted leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 3:41 pm
See SEPTA v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
In Solis v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:06 pm
Wainwright (the 1963 decision requiring that poor people be represented by counsel when charged with serious crimes) and Mapp v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:43 pm
Goff v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am
• Picard is the main go-to guy for SIPC among a small coterie of people whom SIPC uses as trustees and for whom this is lucrative. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 6:28 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
Because of such concerns, Justice Kennedy, writing for the Court, rendered inapplicable a federal employment statute against the States. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
It says that a trustee in bankruptcy can be awarded “reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered,” and that in determining what compensation is reasonable, a court must consider the time spent, (hourly?) [read post]
