Search for: "People v. White" Results 4721 - 4740 of 7,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm by JB
  That is, Scalia's gambit would suggest that most integrative efforts, even if formally race-neutral, are really designed to harm white people and are therefore unconstitutional. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 The central issue presented in the appeal was whether Terry v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 The central issue presented in the appeal was whether Terry v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Wells Bennett
The White Paper (correctly) invoked the Hamdi v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:37 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Bobby shared the White House statement to that effect; Susan explored Rep. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:49 am by Patrick Cormier
Next, if you are in Canada and are looking for information on the Canadian context, the CCCT White Paper 2012 on Court Remote Appearances (also available in French here) should be your next stop. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:55 am
Twain’ Connecticut Yankee v. 63   Clarence had slumped to his knees before I had half finished.... [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:07 pm by WIMS
This case was about giving people a role in the creation of the laws that govern their lives." [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Supreme Court Ruling a Blow to Genetic Privacy The Supreme Court's 5-4 Maryland v. [read post]