Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 4721 - 4740 of 178,400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by John Hochfelder
The jury awarded plaintiff future loss of earnings in the sum of $1,000,000 (21 years); however, plaintiff conceded that the award should be reduced to $302,353, the sum calculated by plaintiffs expert. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 8:13 am by Eric Goldman
Plaintiff alleges Defendants downloaded and copied Plaintiffs copyrighted materials from YouTube, and then re-uploaded infringing versions of Plaintiffs copyrighted media content to their YouTube channels. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
 A few days ago I reported (here) that the Illinois Appellate Court recently decided a case on whether a decedent’s conduct in committing suicide constitutes a superseding cause that defeats a plaintiffs cause of action for wrongful death. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 5:53 am by jonathanturley
 The Supreme Court has held that public figure status applies when  someone “thrust[s] himself into the vortex of [the] public issue [and] engage[s] the public’s attention in an attempt to influence its outcome. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 3:48 am by Stephen Pitel
Three Italian corporations challenged the Ontario court’s jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:00 am
Thankfully, even if the defendant is only one percent liable for the plaintiffs injuries, the plaintiff can still sometimes receive compensation for damages. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 7:58 pm by Allan Blutstein
DOJ (D.D.C.) -- granting summary judgment to government after finding that Executive Office for United States Attorneys performed adequate search, plaintiff received all materials responsive to his request (notwithstanding initial miscounting of pages), and plaintiff did not challenge EOUSA’s redactions. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 6:57 pm by Howard Gutman
The plaintiffs attorney will select a few people as named class representatives, The Court needs to approve or certify the claim as a class and approve a settlement. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm by Howard Friedman
The ministerial exception, therefore, is not applicable to Plaintiff's defamation claims.The court, nevertheless, dismissed this claim without prejudice for failing to adequately set out facts supporting the claim. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:48 pm by Evan Brown
Plaintiff is a lawyer who represented defendant in defendant’s divorce proceedings. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm by Texas Legal News
In the event of a duty breach, the defendant may contend that the breach had little or minimal bearing on the plaintiff's losses. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:39 pm by Anthony Zaller
   The plaintiffs ability to bring claims on behalf of other employees is referred to as “non-individual claims. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:17 pm by Brian Chase
To establish a manufacturing defect in a product liability case, the plaintiff typically needs to demonstrate three key elements. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm by Lee E. Berlik
To survive a demurrer, the plaintiff must plead facts that, if true, would create a plausible inference of actual malice. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:02 pm by Joe Patrice
There's no reason to question the plaintiff's academic career... but this twerp is gonna do it anyway. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 1:57 pm by Max Weirauch
As part of Renne Public Law Group’s (RPLG) affirmative litigation program, we occasionally bring discrimination and retaliation cases on behalf of plaintiffs against corporate employers. [read post]
The impeachment alleged that Paxton made legal decisions to benefit Paul, who paid for Paxton’s home renovations and employed a woman with whom Paxton had an alleged affair. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 11:25 am by Christopher Simon
The plaintiffs appealed the ruling and the Court of Appeals upheld the trial court, so it was on to the Supreme Court for justice. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 11:17 am by Class Action Defense
District Court for the District of Nevada denied Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a wage suppression antitrust class action and declined to exclude two of Plaintiffs’ key experts in Le v. [read post]