Search for: "R G v. G S" Results 4721 - 4740 of 6,912
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2011, 8:21 am by David Smith
So the appeal of Ms S was dismissed and Mr G's suspended order stayed in force but was varied so that he did not have to make payments to the arrears of rent. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:21 am by David Smith
So the appeal of Ms S was dismissed and Mr G's suspended order stayed in force but was varied so that he did not have to make payments to the arrears of rent. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
New Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1 exempts a family office from SEC registration as an investment adviser. [read post]
  It followed that Gs Article 6 rights were not engaged at the internal disciplinary stage, but only at the subsequent ISA hearing. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
Case-law commentaries from across the blogosphere: Duncombe (No. 2) [2011] UKSC 36 Education Law Blog Quader, R (on the application of) v SSHD Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants R (NM) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] The Small Places blog Home Office v Tariq Daniel Barnett’s Employment Law Archive Thamby, R (on the application of) v SSHD – LTTE, nationality, naturalisation and “good… [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 9:55 pm by José Manuel Gómez Porchini
José Manuel Gómez PorchiniUniversidad del Valle de México, Campus Monterrey, Licenciatura LX- UVMjosegomezporchini@live.com.mx  Monterrey, N.L., 01 de julio de 2011ResumenEl docente es, dentro del organigrama de la escuela, el elemento a quien todos los demás hacen a un lado. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:45 pm
Originality • Bridgeman Art Library • Barry G. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:30 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Au travers de ces réflexions apparaissent à la fois l'ampleur des réformes engagées ou attendues, et les difficultés et réticences à construire un «nouveau Bretton Woods».Conformément à la tradition du CEDIN, ce colloque - ouvert par une allocution du Secrétaire général de l'OCDE, M. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:14 am by Sylvain Métille
Un droit exclu par le législateur Le Tribunal fédéral rappelle qu’il s’agit d’un choix du législateur fédéral qui a refusé de reconnaître de manière générale au prévenu un droit de consulter le dossier dès le début de la procédure. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:53 pm
Chief Justice John G Roberts authored the decision, which also said that the court didn’t have to address questions related to its in 1988 ruling Basic Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:28 am by Michael Scutt
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of G) v The Governors of School X probably  not if you’re a teacher in a state school. [read post]