Search for: "Robert v. State"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 19,131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm
It is common to change a revocable trust at least once during the lifetime of the settlor(s).A recent published appellate decision touched upon the issue of compliance with a trust amendment clause:Pena v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Next term, the justices will consider Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 9:38 am
’ ” Roberts v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:03 am
McClain (Boston University) has recently posted to SSRN her article '‘Male Chauvinism’ Is Under Attack from All Sides at Present': Roberts v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
CMS states in the new Final Rule that it will publish further rulemaking to expand this reporting requirement after assessing the progress of its initial phased-in approach. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
CMS states in the new Final Rule that it will publish further rulemaking to expand this reporting requirement after assessing the progress of its initial phased-in approach. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:54 pm
FOSTA has also reportedly generated increased risks for sex workers and frustrated law enforcement efforts to investigate trafficking.WHAT:Oral argument in Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
(GrayLeCozDuan) Robert L. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
’” A case on the Supreme Court’s docket this term, Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Reese v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am
At National Review’s Bench Memos blog, Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around the country. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
Analysis As Marty Lederman and Robert Litt have pointed out, it has been the longstanding view of the Executive branch that this and similar statutes must be read to give the President the final word on whether and how classified information will be provided to the congressional intelligence committees. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:49 pm
Contents include:Marco Roscini, Gravity in the Statute of the International Criminal Court and Cyber Conduct That Constitutes, Instigates or Facilitates International Crimes Maria Pichou, Immunity of Heads of State and Senior State Officials from Subpoenas and Witness Summonses Kassahun Molla Yilma & Julian V. [read post]
