Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 4721 - 4740 of 6,067
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 6:26 am
Edenborough then turned to the Portakabin case said that this case was interesting in regards to Article 6(1) or Section 11(2)(c) defences. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm
The [voluntary and toothless] Code of Advertising does not require a sales promoter to obtain a third party's consent before referring to its brand. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
Enabling urban sprawl: revisiting the Supreme Court’s seminal zoning decision Euclis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm by Keith Lee
Corynne McSherry over at the EFF’s Deeplinks Blog posted a breakdown of a recent decision from the Ninth Circuit in the matter of Vernor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:09 am by Madelaine Lane
Panko, No. 141958, in abeyance pending the Court’s decision in Tusu v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am by James Hamilton
For consistency’s sake, Senator Hagan would expect that, apart from the U.S. marketing restrictions, these provisions will be applied by the regulators in conformity with and incorporating the Federal Reserve’s current precedents, rulings, positions, and practices under Sections 4(c)(9) and 4(c)(13) of the Bank Holding Company Act so as to provide greater certainty and utilize the established legal framework for funds operated by bank holding companies… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm by Kelly
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court N D Illinois: Unrelated sales do not create specific jurisdiction: Merrill Primack v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
            Section 3 provides that an ownership interest or an investment interest:[1] (a) may be through equity, debt or other means; but (b) shall not include ownership of investment securities, including shares or bonds, debentures, notes or other debt instruments, which were purchased on terms generally available to the public and which are in a corporation that is listed for trading on the New York stock exchange or on the… [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 1:23 pm by Tom B
Having taken the time to read through the Respondent’s brief in the Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 5:44 am
Accordingly, defendant’s continuous course of conduct in a large scale drug operation made it reasonable to conclude that the illegal drug sales would continue beyond September 2009. [read post]