Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 8,517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm
And it’s a small step because Senator Leahy’s goal was to introduce something that had a real chance of passing this Congress and not getting vetoed by President Obama. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 10:53 am
Case citation: Demetriades v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 2:09 am
Most people never see them and have no idea of their significance, but they provide the meaningful functionality. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
In People v Schreier, 22 NY3d 494 [2014], the Court made clear that surreptitiousness is a separate and distinct element from whether the recording was done without the subject’s knowledge or consent, and is also separate and distinct from the requirement that the recording took place in a location where the subject had a reasonable expectation of privacy (both of which are also required by the statute). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:36 pm
A recent Massachusetts Appellate Court case, Irwin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:33 pm
Those of us who regularly and zealously challenge illegal searches and seizures in criminal and traffic cases were handed a victory of sorts (victory with a very small “v”) by the Wisconsin Supreme Court last month.In State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of Paroline v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:55 pm
Comment While the numbers of people directly affected by this judgment – which is binding on First Tier Tribunals – may be relatively small, the UT’s approach to defining ‘regularly’ is clearly helpful for those whose overnight care needs are erratic, or unpredictable, but even out over a long period. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:05 am
Nothing in real life actually prepares normal people for the implausibility of comp.A dentist in Nebraska and her insurance carrier found that out.Barbara Potter began her work as a dental hygienist for Patrick McCulla, DDS, around 1981. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:30 pm
Ferguson (separate is equal); Lochner v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:45 pm
” Marbury v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 2:06 pm
In R(Winder) v Sandwell MBC, EHRC intervening [2014] EWHC 2617 (Admin), Hickinbottom J rightly struck down the residence requirements on all grounds. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:10 pm
The lawsuit, captioned Sancho v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:10 pm
The lawsuit, captioned Sancho v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
NRA v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 8:20 pm
At issue in the new case of King v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am
Sheehan v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:18 am
” In a recent case out of Kentucky (In RE: The Estate of Audrey Deinlein v. [read post]
