Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
The case Goodridge v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:28 am
See Pantoja v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
United Air Lines, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 9:37 pm
" This is what is known as the "indirect purchaser" doctrine, and it was eliminated by statutory amendment in a number of states, including California. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm
Brewer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 10:20 pm
Here’s an interesting new case on the scope of cell phone warrants: United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
By contrast, the work of a city council, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:13 pm
United States (2001), GPS location tracking in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:49 am
United States, No. 08-1119, pits a Minnesota law firm against multiple provisions of the federal bankruptcy reform laws of 2005. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 1:55 pm
See State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
The court ruled that Unum, a Fortune 500 company and the largest group and individual disability carrier in the United States, abused its discretion in terminating Mondolo’s disability benefits. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:50 am
The complaint (full text) in Hamdi v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Packert Trustee Chair in Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, discussed how the Sackett v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
In Sharpe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:04 am
However, none of this is meant to diminish the seriousness of the drunk driving epidemic, which is far from over in the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Following Goldsmith was Thomas Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, arguing on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae supporting the petitioners. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:11 am
United States is, ultimately, a simple case. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:23 am
CV058444 DDP (PLAx), venued in the United States District Court Central District of California. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in… [read post]
