Search for: "State v House" Results 4721 - 4740 of 28,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2009, 9:43 am
New West, L.P. , No. 08-3032 In an action involving eminent domain proceedings, district court judgment is affirmed where neither the National Housing Act nor the Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act preempts state and local condemnation laws. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am by Paul Hancock and Andrew C. Glass
On June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court, by a five-to-four margin, upheld the application of disparate impact under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:08 pm by Peter Moulinos
Lexington NY Realty brought before the court the case Manocherian v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:38 pm
District Court for the Northern District of New York Alexander v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am by Dave
In Guiste v Lambeth LBC (2019) EWCA Civ 1758, the Court of Appeal returned again to the meaning of Lord Neuberger’s eliptical phrase in Hotak v Southwark LBC that, for the purposes of the homelessness provisions in the Housing Act 1996, vulnerability meant being significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable as a result of being made homeless. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 1:13 pm
in Congress, then perhaps one might look to the Constitution for an explanation: The fact that every single member of Congress is elected from a defined geographical area and subject, in the case of members of the House, to election every two years, guarantees that "rational" members of Congress will put the interests of their constituents, who will enable their re-election, ahead of evanescent interests of "the country. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
Parties’ submissions Firstly, Mr Robinson submitted that the line of authority beginning with Onibiyo [1996] EWCA Civ 1338 – which established that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal – did not survive the Supreme Court’s decision in BA (Nigeria) [2009] UKSC 7. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am by Melanie Fontes
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 am by INFORRM
  Mr Stark contended that smokers inevitably smoked in their house. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 10:28 am by Giles Peaker
Livewest Homes Ltd v Bamber (2018) EWHC 2454 (QB) This was Ms Bamber’s appeal of a decision on a preliminary issue in possession proceedings. [read post]
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Thursday filed a lawsuit in Georgia, claiming that the state’s newly-drawn state House and Senate districts disadvantage Black voters. [read post]