Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 4721 - 4740
of 15,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2020, 3:56 pm
Plenary Resentencing Denied in First Step Act Case In a published order on March 4, 2020, the Sixth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:49 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, reversing a trial court’s refusal to enter an order enjoining disclosure of confidential information, recently held that the lower court erred when it (a) ruled that the moving party must satisfy all six trade secret balancing test factors, (b) rejected a party’s request for an evidentiary hearing with respect to a key factual dispute as to which the parties submitted conflicting… [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:00 am
[v] Therefore I can confidently state that CanLII’s national market will earn more than enough money. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:31 pm
Default does not deprive the Second Circuit of the ability to review whether the District Court’s injunction complied with FRCP 65(d)(1): “Every order granting an injunction . . . must: (A) state the reasons why it issued; (B) state its terms specifically; and (C) describe in reasonable detail — and not by referring to the complaint or other document — the act or acts restrained or required. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Title may seem surprising b/c Dogan advocated for TM use to distinguish b/t secondary and direct liability in TM law. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Kihuen, Dan Kildee, Carolyn B. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Kihuen, Dan Kildee, Carolyn B. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
The Appellate Division rejected Respondent's "factual parsing of the incident" and concluded that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel precluded the ALJ from deciding again whether Petitioner's conduct amounted to physical abuse of the service recipient.Citing D'Arata v New York Cent. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:45 am
v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 [4] CCA & B, LLC., v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:56 pm
(b) A more detailed consideration of the controlling precedents reinforces this conclusion. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 7:23 am
Baker v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Bowman v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:50 am
Key to answering the question of which rights will trump was the 2001 Supreme Court of Canada case Trinity Western University v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm
§ 314.70(c). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:26 am
' Jane Matthews Glenn, 'Mixed jurisdictions in the Commonwealth Caribbean: mixing, unmixing, remixing' Dale Beck Furnish, 'The law of the Navajo Nation: a three-ingredent mix of consensual (indigeous) and adversary (common law) systems' Esin Örücü, 'Turkey's synthetic legal system and her indigenous socio-cuture(s) in a "covert" mix' Marissa Herbst and Willemien Du Plessis, 'Customary law v… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
An Oregon LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
See, e.g., Cohen v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
Therefore, D1 was novelty-destroying.D5 also disclosed a composition with contents of C, Si, Mn and V overlapping with those of present claim 1. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
Therefore, D1 was novelty-destroying.D5 also disclosed a composition with contents of C, Si, Mn and V overlapping with those of present claim 1. [read post]
