Search for: "State v. Country" Results 4721 - 4740 of 26,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
With Black people holding power in the Republican Party, it is Robert who helps John land his appointment to the Supreme Court.At first, John is awed by his fellow justices, but the country is changing. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by José Carlos Laguna de Paz
But independent agencies in the United States and in most other countries are not completely immune to presidential influence. [read post]
The government relied on the text of Immigration and Nationality Act Section 1255(a), which restricts the in-country adjustment-of-status process to noncitizens who were “inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 3:22 am by Marcia Coyle
In Dobbs, the state of Mississippi says the landmark abortion ruling, Roe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 9:54 am by Ilya Somin
Section 264(a) authorizes the Secretary of HHS "to make and enforce such regulations as in his judgment are necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the States or possessions, or from one State or possession into any other State or possession. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 7:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Bureau of Indian Affairs; 638 Contract)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Makah Indian Tribe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 6:00 am by Elin Hofverberg
Ledamöter på väg uppför Slottsbacken efter 1921 års val [Members of Parliament walking  towards the castle following the 1921 election]. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]