Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 4721 - 4740
of 10,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
Employers that sponsor group health plans that violated certain health care reform mandates for claims and appeals imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will face a duty to pay an excise tax of $100 per violation per day under the expanded Form 8928 filing requirements made applicable to employers providing health plan coverage after 2013 under the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as well undermine the enforceability of claims and appeals decisions under Section… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., as Subrogee of RENEE M. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of the issues on appeal by explaining that[w]e review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 3:29 pm
Post and Beam Equity Group, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
§ 2252(b)(2), requires a mandatory minimum ten-year prison term for a defendant convicted of possessing child pornography if he “has a prior conviction … under the laws of any State relating to aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, or abusive sexual conduct involving a minor or ward,” is triggered by a prior conviction under a state law relating to “aggravated sexual abuse” or “sexual abuse,” even though the conviction did… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
G.S. 7B-323(b), (e). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
This memo will has obvious added consequences to state interpretation to this issue. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:54 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court held, in Heck v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:02 pm
V. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:29 am
In another e-mail, [Heleniak] sent himself an e-mail with ten attachments of child pornography. . . .U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:51 pm
(Wood), Ikram Said, and Amal Said, a/k/a Amal E. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:28 pm
Sekhar v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:11 am
“Jean Jacques Rosseau.Caros Larry, Flora e Keren, qualquer tipo de análise sobre “redes sociais” e/ou acoplamentos parte do princípio de que as relações sociais constituem a unidade básica da humanidade. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
(California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16(b)(1).) [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:51 am
Wonderbread 5 v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
