Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 4721 - 4740 of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Lawrence Higgins
Constitutional Challenge to False Marking Statute  Oral arguments in the case of United States, ex rel. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, these allegations are “utterly refute[d]” by the documentary evidence, which defined the scope of the parties’ engagement and confirmed that defendants had no such duty (Chen v Romona Keveza Collection LLC, 208 AD3d 152, 157 [1st Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks omitted]; CPLR 3211 [a] [1]). [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am by Ross Davies
Italian Colors Restaurant, 133 S.Ct. 2304 (2013) • Mark S. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:45 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark THE EGG for "facial toning machines for cosmetic use" on the ground of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:34 am
VIP Products LLC leaving open the question of whether the Rogers v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:16 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
(quoting Glynwed, Inc., supra, 869 F.Supp. at 276)(internal quotation marks omitted)The law firm of LoFaro & Reiser, LLP represents both plaintiffs and defendants in successor liability actions and fraudulent asset transfers in federal and state courts throughout New Jersey. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:29 pm
This event will focus on the OHIM Community trade mark opposition decision in CANAL + v KABLEPLUS of 13 February 2014, where an opponent was put to proof of use of a mark which was not the basis of his opposition. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
The Board of Trustees of Vincennes University (NFP) In Re the Adoption of R.B.H.; Mark L. [read post]