Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 4721 - 4740 of 71,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2012, 4:11 am by Howard Cartlidge and Lucy Davies
  In respect of s 47A and r 31, the Court held that there was “no question […] of a limitation rule which is intrinsically uncertain”. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7- 8 October 2019. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 3:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
Finally, the paper alludes to a tendency to remove family matters from courts by shifting them to extra-judicial institutions or even to the parties and their party autonomy (section V.). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 9:56 am by Howard Friedman
[R]egulating speech because it is discriminatory or offensive is not a compelling state interest, however hurtful the speech may be.The majority also concluded that because the state's action burdens religiously motivated speech, the hybrid rights doctrine requires strict scrutiny. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:40 am by Dennis Crouch
  He recently offered his annual “state of the court” address at the court’s annual judicial conference. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
R., 2022 QCCA 1145 (CanLII) [77] Il est indéniable que le juge pose un regard sévère sur l’appelant, dont il questionne l’introspection et sa victimisation excessive. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:32 am
The application was based on R. v. [read post]