Search for: "State v. Square" Results 4721 - 4740 of 5,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:27 am by Susan Brenner
’ (quoting Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:06 am by Daniel Richardson
By David RangavizIn re Kimmick, 2013 VT 43Today’s case is about the scope of the right to counsel.This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Gideon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:43 pm by Berin Szóka, Ari Cohn
  Hamburger insists otherwise, alluding to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Marsh v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
First Circuit Rules Nonmember Workers Can’t Be Forced to Fund Union Lobbying Center Square – Bethany Blankley | Published: 2/4/2021 The U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:32 am by SHG
People v Tims, 449 Mich 83, 95, 99, 103-104; 534 NW2d 675 (1995). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Commentary magazine has published the responses they received from a wide variety of writers and broadcasters to the question ‘is free speech under threat in the United States? [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States The Transparency Project highlights new laws focusing on press freedom presented in the recent President’s View number 18. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am by Robichaud
The threat posed by the latter is unique because “when equipped with sophisticated surveillance technologies, the state may be tempted to embark on forward-looking, ‘fishing expedition[s] in the hope of uncovering evidence of crime. [read post]