Search for: "State v. Washington" Results 4721 - 4740 of 17,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2020, 9:58 am by Manny Marotta
Puerto Rico’s newly-elected Governor, Wanda Vázquez Garced, announced in a press conference Saturday that Puerto Rico will hold a non-binding referendum on November 3, the same day as US presidential election, to decide whether Puerto Rico should become a US state or remain a territory. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Conor McEvily
  At the Volokh Conspiracy Orin Kerr weighs in on some of the Chief Justice’s questions during last month’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 2:46 pm
We were happy to learn on Tuesday that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a death penalty case, Baze v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am by Kevin Kaufman
The growth is a result of more states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:45 pm
The court noted that some of the goods sold by Baby Zack's have been shipped in from locations outside the State of Washington. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm by Matthew Seligman - Guest
Washington, a prisoner must establish both deficient performance and prejudice. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)), and pre-Bauman –  thus constitutionally suspect – Delaware state decisions, the district court concluded that personal jurisdiction could lie on the basis of “consent. [read post]