Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 4,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
NAF is known for ruling for lenders over consumers when they don't owe the dept, even in cases of identity theft. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:03 pm
Now, I wonder if he's going to create a complementary deck for bogus rhetorical tactics used by consumer protection "advocates"? [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
To consume is to be a citizen. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:14 am
The government alone can't police the market; competitors and consumers also need to be able to enforce public norms, which is what drove the enactment of California's consumer protection law. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
[Note: I'd also suggest watching (if you haven't already) "Web 2.0 . . . [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
Criminal Sanction Impact. 02/21/07 referred to codes
LAW / CRIM-PROCA5652
Aubertine (MS) -- Extends orders of protection to last for the life of the party against [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
He is also interested in the Consumer Reports question: why does CR get NYT v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:32 am
That doesn't mean you give up. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 5:14 am
"Under plaintiff's interpretation of the [consumer protection] Act, any recall announcement. . . would provide a prima facie case for concealment. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 2:21 am
The case has huge ramifications for consumers and bankruptcy trustees. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 1:02 pm
Television, radio and print media aren't dying, writes Paul R. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:38 am
Thanks to Greg Lastowka for pointing me to this case: Bach v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Strunk v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:41 am
The Humane Society also claimed violations of DC's consumer protection laws based on misrepresentations (basically, saying the magazine/video content is legal, when it isn't). [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:35 am
In Capitol Record v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/08/07 REFERRED TO CODES01/30/07 1ST REPORT CAL.5901/31/07 2ND REPORT CAL.LAW / CORRECTNSS1905
SAMPSON -- Authorizes certain inmates serving an indeterminate sentence to receive good time allowances of up to 1/3 of their minimum sentencesSUMM : Amd SS803 & 805, Cor L Authorizes inmates serving indeterminate sentences of imprisonment for offenses involving controlled substances and marihuana to receive good time allowances against the minimum terms of… [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
A reader in Sacramento who attended the argument very kindly wrote up the following report: Fireside Bank v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Justice Hassell said he didn't understand it, that it didn't make any sense. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:42 pm
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/23/07 referred to codesLAW / CORRECTNSA3198
Pretlow (MS) -- Requires parolees who violate the terms of their release to be placed in the custody of the department of correctional services; repealerSUMM : Amd S259-i, rpld sub 3 P(a) subP (ii), Exec L Provides upon finding of reasonable cause that a parolee has violated the conditions of his or her release, such parolee shall immediately be placed in the custody of the department of correctional service for the purpose… [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Consequently, GMCI has built up extensive goodwill symbolized by the Penthouse marks. [read post]
