Search for: "B&B LLC" Results 4741 - 4760 of 12,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2021, 11:08 am by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
Listen here to the sound.On 25 September 2020, the EUTM application was refused under Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 (EUTMR) on the ground that the sign cannot function as a trademark and would not be perceived by consumers as a badge of origin. [read post]
27 May 2020, 5:14 am by Riana Harvey
The First Board of Appeal (BoA) went on to dismiss the applicant’s appeal (going further so as to deny registration of the mark for class 35 services), also finding the mark devoid of distinctive character.The applicant submitted 3 pleas in law to the General Court (GC) relating to breach of: (1) Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR; (2) principles of equal treatment and sound administration; and (3) Article 7(3) EUTMR [this point mainly concerned the manner in which evidence submitted by the… [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:49 am
Kat friend Shawn Poon from One Legal LLC in Singapore reports below on an interesting decision by the Court of Appeal in Singapore on consumer “indifference” to the mark used. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:27 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
DirectSat USA, LLC on the grounds that trial was not manageable under the plan submitted by plaintiffs, where determining damages would require 2,341 separate evidentiary hearings. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:39 am
Section 2106 was not implicated and, noting that Rule 60(b) was not invoked, ruled that Section 21(b)(1) did not require vacatur. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” The court found Rule 9(b) satisfied given the specificity of the allegations. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 6:48 am by Daniel Jin
Soriano v Forensic News LLC and others [2021] EWHC 56 (QB) [2021] 1 WLUK 106 provides some interesting guidance as to when this extra-territorial jurisdiction is triggered. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Upon closing of the securitization transaction the First Marblehead Corp. would then skim off more than 8% as its “structural advisory fee”.This was possible because the Trusts formed by FMC through the Funding LLC as depositor sold securities far in excess of the value of the pooled loans to be acquired with the proceeds. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:26 pm by Jeff Vail
-Thoughts & Best Practices:- Calendar all known deadlines immediately-Jeff Vail is a Colorado business litigation and personal injury attorney at The Law Office of Jeff Vail LLC. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Second, A and B v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority and Anor. [read post]