Search for: "CITIZENS FOR A BETTER WAY " Results 4741 - 4760 of 9,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
  And, by the way, in the aftermath of Brexit, 37% of millennials supported Texas secession. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am by WIMS
Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Presidential interagency Task Force is releasing its Strategy and its accompanying science-based Pollinator Research Action Plan outlining needs and priority actions to better understand pollinator losses and improve pollinator health. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Gov't officials shouldn't be treated better than average citizens. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 7:00 am by James A. Piazza
Material support, which includes the provision of weapons and funding, correlated with better survival rates for terrorist groups. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 10:13 am
  Indeed, part of the sinister brilliance of the Republican Party leadership's current strategy is to rely on people's better natures, counting on general politeness among the population. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Patient-generated data from social media or commercial devices and apps is not privacy protected in these ways. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:28 am by Jane Chong
“The big problem I see here is that you have an American citizen who had his phone calls recorded. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:32 am by Jay Stanley
They are, however, an independent record that, once captured, does not morph and meld the way human stories and memory can, and is certainly better than solely depending on the word of officers. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
Once again, the Court held that requiring private citizens to impart a message they did not wish to convey would “violate[] the fundamental rule of protection under the First Amendment . . . that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content of his own message. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
Once again, the Court held that requiring private citizens to impart a message they did not wish to convey would “violate[] the fundamental rule of protection under the First Amendment . . . that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content of his own message. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
This means that Twitter must find solutions so that messages sent from our territory, using our language and directed at our citizens do not clearly violate the principles we have set. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
This means that Twitter must find solutions so that messages sent from our territory, using our language and directed at our citizens do not clearly violate the principles we have set. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:07 pm by Erica Gaston
But in my view the better interpretation is that recent events are more simply construed as exercises of unit self-defense. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
Therefore, the best practical choice they have is Apple Pay, but it is not because Apple did a better job: it's because Apple makes Apple Pay the only game in town by not allowing other apps to make use of the iPhone's NFC chip for mobile payment purposes. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 7:00 am by Andrew Delaney
(Except for when we do, because sometimes there just isn’t another way to do it. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
Once again, the Court held that requiring private citizens to impart a message they did not wish to convey would “violate[] the fundamental rule of protection under the First Amendment . . . that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content of his own message. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 2:14 pm by Susan Schneider
; Models and Innovations, Invigorating Local and Regional Economies; and Building Community, Opening Doors and Strengthening Partnerships.The conference was a success in that every speaker offered a different way of looking at this complex food movement. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
Once again, the Court held that requiring private citizens to impart a message they did not wish to convey would “violate[] the fundamental rule of protection under the First Amendment . . . that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content of his own message. [read post]