Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 28,552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2018, 8:25 am
The three-year time limit for filing a paternity challenge under the Revocation of Paternity Act (RPA) does not apply when the presumed father raises the issue in a divorce action, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled.In Taylor v Taylor(Docket No. 336193), a published decision, the Court of Appeals was asked to determine whether a paternity challenge always has to be brought within three years of the child’s birth pursuant to MCL 722.1441(2). [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:10 am
The case is captioned James L. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:10 pm
Pina v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:38 pm
In Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:30 pm
-V. to be the legal mother of a child born on May 1, 2009, to the plaintiff N.N. and declaring article 8 of the Domestic Relations Law and Family Court Act §§ 517 and 542 unconstitutional and void and, upon such declaration, directing the defendant to amend the child’s birth certificate, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, entered January 21, 2010, in Nassau County, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion… [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 9:49 am
Sources: https://www.wisbar.org/forpublic/ineedinformation/pages/guardians-ad-litem.aspx https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/767/v/407 Read More [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 9:21 am
The decision in Haaland v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:45 am
Lopez-Reyes child. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am
The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 Just a quick note to confirm that the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision (reported here) that the Secretary of State cannot use common law claims to recover overpayments of social security benefits where the overpayment is by reason of acccident or error on the part of the benefit agency. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am
The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 Just a quick note to confirm that the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision (reported here) that the Secretary of State cannot use common law claims to recover overpayments of social security benefits where the overpayment is by reason of acccident or error on the part of the benefit agency. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
Sweeney (Indian Child Welfare Act) Petitions were denied in:Wilson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:42 am
State ex rel Kutil & Hess v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 7:07 pm
D'Quaix v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:14 am
[Gulya v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The question above was answered “YES” in the case of Schulze v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The question above was answered “YES” in the case of Schulze v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:41 am
State of Wisconsin (Gaming; Statute of Limitations)Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2017.htmlGTB Anishinaabek Family Services (Child Custody; Traditional Law) In re Donn (Child Custody; Traditional Law)Frank and Risling v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:41 am
State of Wisconsin (Gaming; Statute of Limitations)Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2017.htmlGTB Anishinaabek Family Services (Child Custody; Traditional Law) In re Donn (Child Custody; Traditional Law)Frank and Risling v. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 12:56 am
Stratton v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 8:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
