Search for: "DOE"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 546,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 6:47 am
The Board has stated that a no-recording policy, even if facially neutral, does not override the employee’s right to engage in protected activity. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:40 am
How Does UM/UIM Insurance Protect You? [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:37 am
It does not matter what we think of you. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:37 am
It does not matter what we think of you. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
In contrast, however, Maldonado does not propose restrictions on dating platforms that seek to “bring together date-seekers of certain racial, religious, educational or professional backgrounds” (133). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:29 am
(U.S. 2014) that the “de minimis doctrine does not fit comfortably within the [FLSA], which, it can fairly be said is all about trifles. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:12 am
With that in mind, the guidance concludes that this claim does not recite an abstract idea because it is focused on a specific hardware implementation of a neural network. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
One important question that firms need to contemplate is how they can best adapt to shifting client mindsets about the value of the work that outside counsel does and how they expect to be billed for that work. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"[A] government entity that does not supply any record in response to a FOIL request 'shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such record cannot be found after diligent search' " (Matter of Thomas v Kane, 203 AD3d 1487, 1489 [3d Dept 2022], quoting Public Officers Law § 89 [3] [a]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"[A] government entity that does not supply any record in response to a FOIL request 'shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such record cannot be found after diligent search' " (Matter of Thomas v Kane, 203 AD3d 1487, 1489 [3d Dept 2022], quoting Public Officers Law § 89 [3] [a]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
For better and worse, the House bill does not provide such flexibility in the diplomatic fights it would require the U.S. government to pick. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
The Court does not justify why it should play any role in that issue whatsoever. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
Why then ponder technologies that NetChoice does not even offer? [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
They are so morally opposed to everything Bibi does that they are unable to see some of the value in the difficult decisions he is making. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:59 am
Again, plaintiff requests that: “If the Complaint does not satisfy the pleading requirements established by that case, or by other relevant cases, Plaintiff requests the Court’s direction to amend the Complaint accordingly. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:51 am
What does the Bill do? [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:28 am
The companies say their platforms are not public forums that may be subject to government regulation but rather private services that can exercise their own editorial judgment about what does or does not appear on their sites. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:12 am
"AnalysisIn essence, this ruling provides a path for student-athletes to argue they are employees under the FLSA but does not automatically classify them as such. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:05 am
[T]he resolution of the issue presented in this case ... does not, however, depend upon any interpretation of Canon Law that would violate the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
Law Moms: Juggling Motherhood, Ambition and Personal Fulfillment (2024): What does it really take to balance the scales of justice—and family life? [read post]
